Its a common tactic in countries such as Iran when using covert methods to destroy dissidents. When detained or imprisoned the political prisoner is denied many things and also exposed to many things to ensure their health deteriorates and they are weakened, permanently. The goal is an early death hopefully.
Yet in countries like that the claim is more feasible due to actual physical imprisonment.
In the USA one is imprisoned by a covert system then these methods are also applied so Target's claims of purposeful negligence or mistreatment/malpractice are either not heard so left unaddressed by authorities or disbelieved along with their claims if such conspiracy.
A Target is denied health care via aggressive gang stalking and passive gang stalking methods. Negligence, dropping the ball, frequent mischeduling, forgetfulness, paper work and records mix ups or losses are all methods of negligence or purposefully delaying or denying the TI healthcare. Its Passive GS. Aggressive harassment is done by medical staff themselves and over time the combo of both along with the other parts of the campaign builds a psychological prison within the TI where they are afraid to seek health care.
Then of course it can be claimed this is a symptom of mental illness.
Employees in hospitals or the medical field can use a number of hostile aggressive acts to harass a TI.
Accusations of stealing equipment, rough treatment, performing normal medical procedure in an abusive manner, intimidating the patient verbally, su h as purposely causing pain or fear and then silencing the Target or intimidating them to be silent due to other patients being present.
Very dangerous negligence might consist of not informing the Targeted patient of diagnosis. More than once it'd been alluded to that I have a brain aenyurism. And CAT scans/MRIs have been manipulated like by the doc ordering dye used and the technicians not doing so, MRI exposures being replaced with other peoples images, etc.
Last night someone made a comment to me that was rather nasty: "..and maybe that aneurysm in yer head hasn't burst yet." The way it was said was just too much like a bullseye being hit. And I recalled how perps at St Elizabeths during Bush terrorized me by intimating I had such a medical issue and the resident also spoke of a car accident I was in while living with my dad's sister and her husband in 1990 in NH. Which he made reference to in order to make me feel as if the hit on the head caused this weakness in my vascular system. St Elizabeths Brighton MA was one of the most overt and worst hospitals for being terrorized and harassed, also they were very overt about seeming to know the whole story, not just the cover story.
Negligence in the way of misinforming targeted patience or gas lighting them via withholding information ensures an early demise as the person then will die of or be adversely affected by the maladie.
The Target may feel they can't fight through the gs any longer to get healthcare and just live with multiple health issues that cause not only pain and suffering but weaken the TI and cause early death.
This is of course the desired result for the gang stalking system.
Chroni pain of course adds to stress a.and makes aggitating the Target to react publicly hopefully, much easier.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't think escaping to a foreign country would work. These networks are international. It wouldn't take long before the harassment starts up again. This entire trip is about global control, so fleeing would do you no good. They want you to think it would, but I doubt it every much. You could try, though, and blog your experiences.
ReplyDeleteYou're right about the employment situation. I have a master's degree, and have been working part-time since august 2004, with summers off mostly. Haven't been making anything. And the more you get rejected, the bigger the gaps in your work history get, and employers use that as an excuse to bar you. So it's yet another part of the perps' plan for TIs. So that's one thing you can take heart it: even if you did get a college degree, you'd be barred and blacklisted from any employment your degree allows you to work in. So it wouldn't matter. It sure didn't matter in my case.
ReplyDeleteAnd there have been ideations from the perps that I take a hard labor job, which requires only a HS diploma or GED. At least that would be making me some income, according to them, and they also hint I would love those kinds of jobs. But then, it would mean demeaning myself in the process, as I have an MS and BS, to live with the fact that I could never have a job I am qualified for. Add to this the fact that I'd be busting ass for very little pay, and get my body wrecked in the process. I'd rather have my part-time teaching job which requires a Masters. I have been going backwards in the savings account, despite working, just not making enough. And the psych. warfare I am getting from perps and everywhere else is rubbing that fact in making me feel like shit.
ReplyDeleteAnd who knows how these perps are getting compensated, if they are. One TI who stopped blogging noted that one former friend who sold her out, all she did was ask profiling questions, and do some perping. And she discovered that this former friend got a huge social security back-payment. See, not only do they take our jobs, but they get compensated for perping us and informant-ing us as well (snitching). So they do get paid well for engaging in psych. warfare tactics they do against us. I think not all get paid. The ones that don't get a thrill at our expense. It was leaked to me that it's very expensive to target us.
ReplyDeleteSo now you know why our federal deficit is so damned huge, especially when Reagan and Bush were in office. It's all Black Budget Money, some of it used to target us.
So if you research the federal budget deficit, note that it was hideous when Reagan was in office. When Clinton took office, it (deficit) went way down, and the economy was much better. But when Bush took office, it went way up again, and the economy tanked. It would be nice to note a trend in this spending, and correlate it to who was in office.
ReplyDelete