Please be advised that this written work is theory. It's theorizing, pondering and amateur research. For legal reasons I state that I have no actual belief in these theories as fact, if I did I would have sought legal recourse. Until that occurs this blog can only be considered theory. If it does then any and all actions PAST AND FUTURE that have been taken against me during the years producing this work will be labeled war crimes under international law and any other legal protections that apply.
I am a writer, an activist and artist. I claim my RIGHT TO EXIST legally under US Constitution and international law.
This is an educational blog for awareness as well as sometimes a telling of candid personal experiences to demonstrate theories as they might be experienced by a person who theoretically is existing under such conditions. Thus the 'candid' expression, poetic license and marketing myself as product or character. This is NOT a journal or diary.
Being a reasonable person of sound mind if I had concerns for my safety or others I would take responsible action for self care as my established medical history can demonstrate.
Any actions taken against me by others questioning my sanity or competence based on my produced work will be construed as activist/dissident intimidation and whistle blower retaliation and proper legal action will be taken against you by my family and support system.
Be warned that no further interference with my production of meaningful work as an artist and activist will be tolerated.
Just because a certain privileged group doesnt like what someone writes it does NOT give them the right to silence such people. I think this is what the Deep State theory is about-absolutely no respect for the US Constitution, human and civil rights laws and international laws against torture etc.
I live in an area where there is far too much wealth, power and influence in a small compact area and it goes largely unchecked. Recently with a high concentration of contractors, IT, real estate and big pharma here, it seems whatever balance was kept in decades past is now gone forever.
What occurred to me in the past few months now Ive calmed a bit from the past two years of being traumatized is that other activists and writers who speak out and are far more fringe (I like to think 'cutting edge' myself) than I am and alot less reasonable yet their sanity ir character has never been questioned officially and their writing has never been used as a basis for such investigation.
David Icke published many books and one of them-the infamous "The Biggest Secret" makes claim to the royal family of Britain being shape ahifting lizards who change before people's eyes and indulge cannibalism.
Though there is a historical basis for the nasty habits of elites world wide in the history of every civilization, its assumed more occult of a theory and less the makings of a really bad horror movie.
Its complicated. Its theory and therefore its never going to be a scientific principal (like gravity for instance) until someone provides indisputable evidence.
I believe Arizona Wilder is indeed a RA Survivor but she may be easily led and manipulated. Drugging and masks could produce such results as is a theory of alien abductees' experiences or other methods.
He makes money hand over fist with these books as well as merch and websites that discuss all sorts of conspiracy theory.
Just because hes a former UK soccer star that makes him untouchable?
Alex Jones is another example. Many of us for years as well as OCCUPY Austin TX that experienced questionable actions by him have questioned his legitimacy, even if perhaps he may be unaware of his own status as disinfo agent.
His rants are something to be seen and discredit anyone theorizing about anything similar in nature. Everyone pioneering and having to be brave throughout is going to be scared and nervous with alot of steam to blow off but when it becomes that self indulgent it hurts the movement and everyone who can be helped by it.
Ive been guilty of this in past years, alowing my blog to become a bit too much of a venting area but when someone has resources, a studio, a crew and cameras rolling it seems a bit less likely that they would not see the error of this behavior.
He has expressed he has had difficulties with those in power but it never seems to amount to much.
I started to whine and vent alot on my blog and be candid about the awful environment being created by the Obama administration is all yet this guy is breaking into Bohemian Grove and sh*t making all sorts of claims....yet thats not questionable.
Why hasnt anyone written email faxes threatening authorities under this guy's name??
Hes pissed enough people off obviously.
Because he probably has money and property and lawyers most of all but also hes a man.
Notice there are no female activists of any substance in this community. There are many but we are always under the radar, even the 'high profile' Survivors like Cathy Obrien etc (who also hasnt had any such nonsense happen as Ive had in the past two years.)
Whoever or whomever is behind these threats under my name is or are complete punk ass cowards who can only come after a single female with no resources to speak of and no material assets.
Of course my age has been used against me in these cases, especially the most recent one because I'm not youngish and cute anymore the 'bag lady, crazy cat lady' image was attempted to be used.
It seems America especially collegiate areas who are spoiled rotten with oceans of young women hate middle aged females unless they are well heeled servants of the power structure in place.
Maybe because they know intuitively that with no children and the blinding effects of estrogen waning and making a woman's perceptions of the world skewed and biased, older women can not only see more clearly but understand the male mind better. Wanting to genuinely fix things wrong with the system before she dies becomes the main motivator for the older female.
One day I would love to be introduced face to face to the anonymous stalker whos comments on my blog range from warning me about being arrested for the emails he or she sent to accusing me of getting into trouble because I am such a 'right wing gun supporting conservative' then morphing into insulting me because I support abortion and accusing me of being a snaggle toothed raging lesbian.
And this has been ignored by every single authority Ive dealt with concerning these frame ups. Ive never once been directly questioned and theres never been an investigation to protect me or follow up on these leads.
I guess its objective and selective as to who gets questioned about their right to free speech depending on their gender, economic status and if they played pro sports or not before being involved in seeing shape shifting lizards or having publicly broadcasted tantrums discrediting activists on the front lines for years to come.
Has anyone else been experiencing very rehearsed seeming and repetitive verbatim questions concerning travel destinations or origins?
These mini interrogations (think of the recent PC conconcept of 'micro aggressions' or 'triggers', most popular on college campuses or in a collegiate area.)
This seemingly innocent question or questions are always verbatim or exactly the same in every encounter.
They also seem very rehearsed and unnatural.
Usually they are coming from employees or small business owners and recently some instances of drivers of ride services like Lyft and Uber. Very seldom do they originate from random persons in day to day life but this can happen. Most
Travelers can tell who is genuinely interested in their travel experiences and who is 'playing cop'-which is really obvious when its done by people who are not trained, capable law enforcement.
It will always be the exact same sentence like "Where are you headed and where are you coming from?" With variations of course for the number of persons being posed this question.
"Are you camping?"
When one hears these two phrases for example, repeatedly, by nervous, edgy people who dont seem genuine and seem to have NO OTHER interest in you or your travel history or plans other than satisfying THAT question posed with an answer then one has to examine the situation.
Specifically the effect the questioning has.
People who are being real with you and inquire as to gear and or travel usually either admire your lifestyle (even though its probably romanticized) and are curious or have travel experience themselves. There will always be a conversation struck up by the initiating questions and the person doing so will have opinions or stories of their own. They wont be suspicious acting and robotic in posing their inquiries to start with.
When people engage in conversation with those who are genuine, you should feel free and at ease with the excitement that comes from true exchange of ideas and experiences or passing on knowledge and awareness to other human beings.
There forms a mutual admiration between those who have traveled similar places or in similar ways. Its innately GOOD and you know it.
When a person is confronted by a shady human being who seems uninterested but just plain greedy for some other motive, who asks the same line of questioning that one has heard spoken the exact same way (verbatim sentence or phrase) by similar types of people repeatedly and said questions seem put forth robotically and aggressively you should notice your first instinctual response, especially as a female as being fear as well as a sense of being put upon or attempted control. This immediately makes you angry and unfortunately you cannot afford to get angry.
Basically this is confrontational and its intimidation.
Either answer and SUBMIT or react in natural self defense which of course-makes the person being questioned the one who looks potentially:
Of low intelligence
'Out of control'
A bad person who deserves to be shunned by society
(Fill in blanks with any of these choices).
These people can also be categorized as baiters or agitators not just possibly harassing people for whatever reason.
It would theoretically be a nice ploy to drive away 'homeless' people out of an area IN THEORY via this method. They would either get sick of being questioned in an obviously interrogating manner and feel unwelcome by such aggression or possibly fall to baiting where they become aggressive due to this activity being another stressor in their lives.
Its not important to know the motive of this bizarre behavior but knowing how to deal with it is, especially being a woman with males involved, it could be potentially dangerous.
In our society men should know better than to ask women who are alone their private affairs especially something as sensitive as their whereabouts which is a security risk to female safety as well as our sense of feeling safe.
This is what also makes this line of questioning so seemingly odd, unreal and unnatural.
Who are you to basically demand answers from me, as a woman, when you are male, when you dont even know me?
This will piss an independent woman off if done repeatedly like nothing else and as tasteless as it seems-that is a viable motive in part. (IN THEORY..of course).
If women were repeating the same question verbatim frequently in a confrontation, aggresive manner I would find it odd but feel a hell of alot safer about it.
The ride service is easy to deal with-just give the driver a poor rating and site 'service' as a reason.
These drivers may also be trying to catch extra money by offering passengers rides without the service knowing it as a motive and in some instances, that seems most plausible but other times its just haraasment and a driver under those circumstances will ask repeatedly even after the passenger makes it obvious they are not interested in such a line of conversation.
Theres no need to be rude either. Simply ignoring the question and going on to something else or giving a vague, short UNINFORMATIVE answer is adequate. You always want to lay the burden of further possible harassment on the potential perpetrator. Not yourself.
So in a way, this action may also be considered a form of baiting, due to the possible negative reaction of the person being questioned as it may cause fear, anxiety or confusion in understanding how to deal with it.
Its bad form and business to take an undocumented ride all or part way for various reasons.
First its unsafe because the company no longer has your location with the driver. Also any wrongdoing is easier to deal with legally if things are legit.
Second it puts your cred as a passenger and customer at risk with the company. What is one driver compared to the company who sends you ALL of your drivers?
For instance if you mentioned you were going to a train station locally and the driver keeps at it about where you are going from there and has ALSO mentioned they are going towards the area the train heads towards then making a buck from side work is plausible and most likely.
However, if the driver seems more interested in both origin AND destination, as well as the person seems very edgy and controlling and is determined to control the conversation content without any viable motive other than gaining answers (and control) from the passenger then you may have harassment on your hands.
Most drivers from these services are exceptionally nice, friendly and safe but on occasion when it doesn't seem making some extra money is the motive and you have travel gear it becomes uncomfortable and puts unnecessary stress into your day.
I have never had this experience with female drivers. Perhaps reporting male drivers who engage in this for any motive might be the solution but many of us are afraid to make waves. It may be necessary however to establish this line of questioning as offensive in the same vein as micro aggressions, triggers and unPC generally.
It may be possible to do what many people have done to avoid offensive questions based on race, job description, age etc-reframe this as an offensive line of questioning, potentially designed to disrupt the daily life of those fitting a certain description and demographic as well as cause harm or psychological stress, emotional duress etc.
Living alternatively has become more challenging by new social norms (often misguided) yet made easier by a society that exists globally.
You may consider yourself a proud, poineering techo-nomad, Traveler or alt lifestyle person but to many people we still appear to be without homes or means which ends up being the dreaded 'The Homeless' label.
In that case one certainly should question his early mentoring by Roman Polanski.
Even before an age of surveillance authorities can not possibly be that unimformed and negligent.
How is it that I have a legit case where I have been stalked by an unknown person who comments on my blog and frames up three times for threatening authorities and yet in this age of technology and surveillance this has not once been focused on and my civil and human rights have been violated repeatedly?
While truly evil, bad people move about seemingly undetected decade after decade that cause real harm to society, innocent people become victims of injustice by the justice system and related fields.
How is this the case?
People are so overwhelmed with information with personal technologies that they seem to actually know less about what is really going on or they are being given a smoke screen of sorts to hide the truth about what society is really about.
Every case Ive read over the years consists of repeated negligence and cover ups resulting in serial killers and other criminals being allowed to continue to commit their crimes and do extrmely brutal and harmful things to humanity.
It would be interesting to examine exactly what motive would exist for allowing brutal serial killers to continue to victimize and destroy people (mostly women and children).
"For those who wonder how modern Western societies can advocate policies and hold beliefs that manifestly harm themselves, look no further than the fact that the highly intelligent are in charge. This is the flip side to Herrnstein and Murray’s hypothesis that the U.S., and by extension other Western societies, have become technocratic and ruled by those with higher intelligence; it gives new meaning to William F. Buckley’s quip that he would rather be ruled by the first 300 names in the Boston phone book than by the faculty of Harvard. It might also suggest that there are worse things than democracy."