TRANSLATOR

Indigo Awareness Ribbon

Indigo Awareness Ribbon

Blog DISCLAIMERS

Please be advised that this written work is theory. It's theorizing, pondering and amateur research. For legal reasons I state that I have no actual belief in these theories as fact, if I did I would have sought legal recourse. Until that occurs this blog can only be considered theory. If it does then any and all actions PAST AND FUTURE that have been taken against me during the years producing this work will be labeled war crimes under international law and any other legal protections that apply.
I am a writer, an activist and artist. I claim my RIGHT TO EXIST legally under US Constitution and international law.

This is an educational blog for awareness as well as sometimes a telling of candid personal experiences to demonstrate theories as they might be experienced by a person who theoretically is existing under such conditions. Thus the 'candid' expression, poetic license and marketing myself as product or character. This is NOT a journal or diary.
Being a reasonable person of sound mind if I had concerns for my safety or others I would take responsible action for self care as my established medical history can demonstrate.
Any actions taken against me by others questioning my sanity or competence based on my produced work will be construed as activist/dissident intimidation and whistle blower retaliation and proper legal action will be taken against you by my family and support system.

Be warned that no further interference with my production of meaningful work as an artist and activist will be tolerated.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Supreme Court Ends Restriction Of Corporations Donating To Candidates (Centry Old Law!)

The Supreme Court got rid of restrictions on corporations donating to campaigners in elections:
http://archive.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/01/supreme-court-lifts-curbs-on-corporate-political-donations.html

This is one of those indications that the country is never going back to what it was.

A corporation is NOT a person. The free speech rule should apply to people not companies as well as this is not about free speech its about money and influence. And it isnt appropriate becuz a corporation as a 'person' if you insist, can must up a whole lot more money and even more influence than just one person or special interest.
I cannot believe this went through on this premise.

No comments:

Post a Comment