I've always been bad at math and I'm no economist but when doing research on say who owns certain things it became disturbing to learn that the same names kept popping up Vanguard Inc, Blackrock, Blackstone group etc.
So say you're trying to find out exactly who owns Starbucks and how the company is set up, if they have military contracts etc (certain things explain alot if a company seems to engage in particularly aggressive 'gang stalking' campaigns or activities. Most chain stores engage in GS however they are varied in their methods, tactics, and who is involved, just like differences in every state one goes to, you'll discover these differences in companies. It also seems to depend on location if a TI is harassed heavily or not. Harassment is always worse anywhere easily accessible by public transit and other such patterns.
It seems that companies connected to the military industrial complex have more vested interest in harassment campaigns and many other connections to different industries or companies as factors.)
So looking up Starbucks I realized that most of that company was owned by Vanguard Inc, Blackrock etc. These names also came up when I was researching cell phone towers. Turns out that the public perception of communication companies 'owning' their towers is false.
People always say that Verizon's system isnt compatible with the other phone companies' systems because they run on a different system and they own the towers. Smaller companies such as Cricket or Walmart Family Mobile then piggy back off of the big main companies signals, say Verizon's or T Mobile's.
After reading up on this it seems it would actually be really stupid from a financial point of view to own towers as physical property due to ongoing maintenance issues of the towers, the posts they are rooted into and that property etc. So Verizon actually leases the physical cell phone towers from companies like American Tower Corp, Crown Castle etc. Disturbingly these companies are mostly all in Massachusetts and the main owners of them are the big names that seem to own everything else nowadays: Vanguard Inc, Blackrock etc.
This can't be good and when one applies the dangers of what's going on with electromagnetic pollution or even theories of possible 'psycho management' of human populations.
Most people also don't understand that the 'wireless' and 'cloud' service they have gotten from 2g through 4g actually comes from fiber optics (broadband) laid deep on the ocean floors spanning the globe.
With billionaires like Elon Musk pushing Starlink (literally pushing other satellites out of the way https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-refuses-starlink-satellite-move-odd-space-agency-tweets/ ) it's about to get much worse. Using satellites as opposed to broadband is going to be alot different environment.
The illusion of consumer choice is the least of our worries at this point.
It's already been put forth that theoretically if 'protecting the US economy is part of national security' then wouldn't that be accomplished by any means necessary? Thus any secret or covert methods could be hidden under 'national security' or information withheld due to that?
In theory sinister methods could be used (psycho management, chemical influence, human forces using psych warfare or pavlovian psychology or a combination thereof) such as influencing consumer behaviors, theft prevention even using surveillance or any other systems available in both private and public spaces to target dissidents or anyone whos exposing corruption would threaten national security.
No comments:
Post a Comment