https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/11/us/organ-transplants-houston.html?smid=url-share
An example of how targeting a person could be possibly achieved if so desired. The story has not grown yet such as his motive for his actions etc.
The reasons he actually got caught are probably as follows:
-the program is one of the smallest in the country so the disproportionate mortality rate was easily noticed.
-its TX not a more notoriously corrupt area such as NYC or Massachusetts, Chicago etc where people 'stick together' with a long history of 'codes of silence' or institutions connected to international power structures.
It's frustrating to read that programs rarely get shut down due to ethical concerns. Ethical concerns are actually not dealt with as they should be in many health care systems and that's based on providing a standard of care or behavior of staff.
The newest attempt to cover this up by focusing on race as the singular factor of inequal treatment is just another empty gesture.
I've seen way to many institutions pass students who are not qualified or have appropriate skills specifically in dentistry. I've talked to many people with degrees in the scientific field who are now employed and they appear more like factory workers than people who genuinely possess any real intelligence for the job. They are trained to perform the job they aren't genuinely intelligent.
Education and employment are now akin to simply getting people trained to perform a needed task.
If people are intelligent it seems they have more ability to play games or are influenced to treat certain patients differently.
Denying people care is easier than you'd think. Not getting caught is how you succeed in doing it.
Think of the example of how Iranian political prisoners are killed off. The person is denied food water medical care etc for many years and other things are done so that when they are released they simply die. Then the system just denies any involvement in the person's death but obviously their negligence OVER TIME is what produced that result.
Theoretically a person who's being targeted over many years could suffer ill health, loss of quality of life and an early death due to negligence that is done methodically and systematically.
In the theory of 'targeted individuals' this is referred to as passive harassment or I call it passive gang stalking as opposed to active gang stalking. It is the action of ensuring inaction that produces the effect. Purposeful negligence or just plain bad treatment and behavior by providers will effect the person's health over a long period of time or even put off the targeted person to healthcare entirely eventually resulting in deteriorated health.
It's totally untraceable and blame is easily put on the patient for what appears to be their own negligence.
The article said this physician was arrogant and aggressive. That makes him obvious. His choices are based on these characteristics as he probably thought he wouldn't be caught.
The key to making a slow kill on someone work is a quiet, methodical careful approach where multiple people work in unison and over time being cautious about doing anything to overt.
Over time the impact on the targeted person's health is devastating.
This can be viewed as neutralizing a target effectively.
What this doctor did sounds like good old fashioned abuse of power. What are experiencing nowadays en masse is much more dangerous: the corporatizing of medical care and an adjoining education system that pumps out graduates like factory workers bees. Most damaging is the lack of humanity and human dignity in globalist society generally.
That's not going to be fixed by oversight or people signing pledges because 'inequality' is constantly being identified.
This is accompanied by the arrogance of people percieving that all inequality is being identified. What if it's not identified? What if it's actually growing due to implementation of a system of ideology in a field that should not have any influence from politics or ideology, like medicine for instance?
That would make it even easier to neutralize people as long as you avoided detection by adhering to the latest guidelines of what is and who is most likely being victimized by inequality treatment instead of a case by case basis.
If the motive for this doctor's actions in the article above turns out to be racially motivated or motivated by patient financial status (as nowadays they are unfortunately synonymous) it will make it even harder to have people perceive crimes against individuals.
If the motive was something like the doctor favored patients based on his personal relationships with them or his personal dislike of them or some sort of plot of evil design or conspiracy among multiple people then it will be almost like a breakthrough now. We can once again work on awareness as people will have a new point of reference fresh in their minds.
People have become so entirely brainwashed to believe that if they can identify a problem in society by using a wide range or wide brush if you will (demographics, race, religion etc) then society is cleansed.
We are 'better together'. We are 'stronger'. We are building a better world. Etc.
However what I see is an ease of treating singled out people and even entire groups of demographics badly as long as no one perceives the situation correctly. Due to those person's being mere individuals people seem trained to squeeze them out even seeming to block them out mentally even for consideration that wrongdoing has occurred or the group they belong to or demographic is one that is considered unimportant.
This one individual doctor's actions could awaken the public from their sleep that's been induced by terrorism over 23 years time. He will have served to help more people in spite of himself than he killed by his wrong actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment