TRANSLATOR

Indigo Awareness Ribbon

Indigo Awareness Ribbon

Blog DISCLAIMERS

Please be advised that this written work is theory. It's theorizing, pondering and amateur research. For legal reasons I state that I have no actual belief in these theories as fact, if I did I would have sought legal recourse. Until that occurs this blog can only be considered theory. If it does then any and all actions PAST AND FUTURE that have been taken against me during the years producing this work will be labeled war crimes under international law and any other legal protections that apply.
I am a writer, an activist and artist. I claim my RIGHT TO EXIST legally under US Constitution and international law.

This is an educational blog for awareness as well as sometimes a telling of candid personal experiences to demonstrate theories as they might be experienced by a person who theoretically is existing under such conditions. Thus the 'candid' expression, poetic license and marketing myself as product or character. This is NOT a journal or diary.
Being a reasonable person of sound mind if I had concerns for my safety or others I would take responsible action for self care as my established medical history can demonstrate.
Any actions taken against me by others questioning my sanity or competence based on my produced work will be construed as activist/dissident intimidation and whistle blower retaliation and proper legal action will be taken against you by my family and support system.

Be warned that no further interference with my production of meaningful work as an artist and activist will be tolerated.

Monday, January 25, 2016

Read Part 1: Police Corruption: Drug gangs, steroids and fighting gyms. Who really had a motive to kill the Waltham 3? by B Blake

http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/police-corruption-drug-gangs-steroids-and-fighting-gyms-who-really-had-a-motive-to-kill-the-waltham-three-part-2.html

1 comment:

  1. This is interesting:

    https://s3.amazonaws.com/ClubExpressClubFiles/770242/documents/FBI_Press_Release_10-18-13.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIB6I23VLJX7E4J7Q&Expires=1453790894&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DFBI_Press_Release_10-18-13.pdf&Signature=3Lh9mJVjAgyFeZgAaD3YQNcqIoY%3D

    To be absolutely clear:
    No one was surveilling the Tsarnaevs and they were not identified until after the shootout. Any claims to the contrary are false.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Ah, but they didn't catch this self-contradicting statement:

    "No one was surveilling the Tsarnaevs and they were not identified until after the shootout."

    And how would they know that "no one was surveilling" them? Note they didn't say "the FBI was not surveilling them". The way they worded their statement, they are claiming that there were no parties, including the FBI or other entities, surveilling them. And if they knew for sure that no one was conducting surveillance ops, they'd had to have had surveillance on them in the first place to see that no other party except the FBI had surveillance on them. So the logical outcome is that the FBI had surveillance, not anyone else, and they are admitting they are lying.

    Sounds like more blatant denial. Like they've been doing for years. Sounds so much like what the lady told you when you phoned the FBI office: "no one is stalking you". And she knows this how?

    ReplyDelete