In this article it is attempted to connect his choice of location for exploding himself in a small RV however other news outlets have stated that police recognize the vehicle for years becuz he had been parked there for a long amount of time regularly.
This latest article states that his girlfriend had reported to local police a year ago that he had been building bombs in the RV.
It is thus irrelevant what motivated him becuz it could have been prevented.
One could theorize that he had chosen the RV's location for its proximity to the AT&T building theoretically to disrupt cell phone operations in planning to execute the bombing becuz it seems he was building bombs last year. However one would have to find out how long he had lived in the area and how long he had been parked there. He may have actually been using that space to park the vehicle long before building bombs.
We can also see that once again THE FBI OR OTHER HIGHER UP LAW ENFORCEMENT and AUTHORITIES HAD INFORMATION/INTEL THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN RELEASED TO OTHER AGENCIES OR FOLLOWED UP ON. This is a common occurrence in everything from the Boston Bombing to 9-11 to the Capitol Insurgency or riot in January 2021 as well as various lone shootings.
Russia Warned U.S. About Boston Marathon Bomb Suspect Tsarnaev : report
Govt Terrorist Trackers Before 9/11: Higher Ups Wouldn't Listen
Why Didnt The FBI and DHS Produce a Threat Report Ahead of the Capitol Insurrection?
In the end one has to realize that just becuz someone believes in a conspiracy theory or hears about it doesnt mean that is what leads to violence nor should one believe that conspiracy theories generally will lead to violence or that 'conspiracy theorists' are innately violent individuals.
Its amazing that after this year of violence, deaths, injuries, property damage, harassment due to protests concerning police brutality that seems racially biased and manufactured by the corportocracy (made more traumatic by being perpetrated during a human plague outbreak of which the deaths seem unimportant in contrast) one small RV exploding with a home made bomb within (after a warning was issued to avoid human casualties or injuries) made by a person without any training or education in war or terrorism can cause the psychological and collective fear and have such importance in comparison.
This is the very definition of the psychological terrorism that is occurring by the 'framing up' a certain subject matter or the people who are involved in discussing such subject matter as 'dangerous' or deadly prompting the public to consider such people or content as dangerous and deemed necessary to block free speech as well as vilify those who are involved in such subject matter.
How can the violence of one person compare to the violence of an entire group of extremists either on domestic soil or abroad? The horrors of automated warfare such as drone strikes dont even seem to enter the public's mind or the fact that it should be illegal in any country as a part of warfare anywhere on our planet. Why does a lone actor scare people more than extremist groups or the future prospect of deadly horrifying automated warfare (that includes robotics)? Why is everything the media claims always excepted especially when its easy nowadays to produce fakes-both documents and online content? As well as producing motives or other info about a perpetrator who often is killed by police or kills themselves and the dead cant testify or defend themselves?
Thats exactly why. Becuz dead people are like marionettes that can be used for any purpose that is desired not just as patsies but to be built up in the publics mind to serve the purpose of psychological terror and manipulation.
On a conservative news station one of the anchors was complaining that as the Dr Suess books were being banned by PC sensibilities lately, he pointed out that one could still purchase books written by Hitler. That was the comparison he made-that a person could purchase and read works by Hitler but not Dr.Suess. Anyone whos thinking with a mind that looks for answers hidden in shadows or reflections from mirrors that reflect our worlds reality can easily spot the con involved: becuz its beneficial for the system to ensure that the public continue to read about Hitler. It serves a purpose. Its also most likely that one is children's content and the other adult. Its also likely that the act of banning books is in itself a tactic to intimidate the public as well as cause outrage and anger.
An example is the reptilian conspiracy theory popularized by David Icke is one that no one in the conspiracy community who seeks serious alternative theories or facts takes seriously. It was always a kind of tongue-in-cheek sort of thing. The fact David Icke sold books and built a small empire based on this theory using an alleged SRA Survivor named Arizona Wilder actually shows how ridiculous the audience of conspiracies has become and how conspiracy culture has trickled down into pop culture. Any sort of consideration of reptilian energies etc that one could even debate existed would be more on the end of self indulgent theorizing and it would relate to occult material concerning The Orders or ancient sun worshipping cults etc. Even then it would be considered occult in nature, such as possession or a spiritual or inter dimensional theory. The idea that actual human beings would be able to shapeshift within this dimension being able to be viewed by other humans is ridiculous. There exists beliefs from Native tribes about shapeshifting humans. Theres also theories about different kinds of alien entities that may exist within a dimensional world where they could fool humans by hiding thier existence by masking themselves using time and space etc. These are all interesting theories but they are very much not relevant to humans day to day life in society unless one has seen something shocking first hand or is a UFO victim. One has to understand that a conspiracy theorist has to act like an astronomer that dabbles in astrology or a western doctor that partakes in herbalism or holistic medicine. You have to be responsible and try to find facts first and see if any alternative information fits into theories concerning reality not speculation about what reality is.
For people to believe anything they read is always a danger. When one considers the factors as to why something causes violence one must ask why now and why here? I think people will find that in the past conspiracy theories weren't related to such issues and crazies were crazy all on thier own and formed their own insane theories (Son of Sam killer etc) and that the factors of whats going on in society at that moment might be more of a contributor than theories themselves. In a world we have today as it is now, anything may cause violence from the public and there's various factors involved in that. None of which those in power will or want to change anytime soon. Chaos and Divide and Conquer traditionally give those in power control. Whats most shocking is that it still works in this day and age with humanity's 'progress'. In reality, human NATURE allows for these tactics to be used against human populations repeatedly.
At some point I will map out that theres been an ongoing campaign to silence alternative information since whistleblowers Snowden, Manning and WikiLeaks started making people in power nervous during Obama.
Theres been a multi year long, systematic ploy to discredit anyone presenting alternative facts or theorizing about official story lines or even conspiracy theories generally. Conspiracy theories are now on the table to be censored by the public being conditioned to perceive such things as being dangerous content or 'fake news', misinformation etc. Search engines like Google and Youtube are already censoring such content with algorithms.
Repeatedly linking unpredictable, deadly violence to anything is going to make the public more easily fear it and reject it.
For now lets just point out that during Obama, 'lone wolf' or lone actor violence (now dubbed 'domestic terrorism') was higher than any prior presidential administration. During his first term the violence often had no motive given. In his second term lone shootings began to be caused primarily by actors whos motives were allegedly due to white supremacy or some sort of gripe with non whites. We must remember that the second term of Obama had people in that administration seeking to get racism to be officially deemed a mental disorder by psychiatry. Seriously..I am not making this up.
With Trump coming in we saw the Vegas shooting which had all the plot holes of every other lone shooting throughout the past two administration but it defied the usual suspect profile.
The Vegas shooting began an era of such violence being allegedly motivated by conspiracy theories and paranoia and much of this was contrived by media and consisted of hearsay.
In the Vegas shooting law enforcement in NV specifically stated that no material was found such as manifestos or conspiracy theories etc in the shooters computer.
Certain news outlets who've become questionable recently published sketchy articles claiming that authorities were supposedly claiming the shooter was a conspiracy nut due to people overhearing conversations he had in restaurants etc.
New documents suggest Las Vegas shooter was conspiracy theorist – what we know
If hearsay isnt admissible in a court room it certainly isnt a reliable source for an criminal or other kind of investigation. Testimony is quite a different thing than hearsay.
This was noticed by many people both in the conspiracy community and otherwise but the intimations and bogus articles put out by news outlets that kiss the Left's butt like The Guardian are consumed by an unaware public and only their disinformation is retained. The Guardian was formerly trustworthy and something I would have used for info now degenerated into mere Leftist agenda peddling with no real journalistic integrity or objectivity but shockingly that is where I found the worst example of peddling the hearsay angle being worked in the Vegas shooter case. It was very sad for me to see that.
The biggest holes in info or intel about lone shootings is usually that theres a lack of video or photographic content that can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person being blamed actually committed the act of violence or that they were acting alone etc. Just as the system has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an accused has committed a crime so this should be the case for people who are deceased. That's the other common factor that makes finding the truth problematic is that lone shooters end up dead at the scene far too often.
If they don't, as in the brothers who allegedly did the Boston Bombing-they are guarded by authorities in a manner that appears as if they are trying to ensure that information does not get to the public that would put the official narrative in danger of being questioned or appear to be untrue or incomplete.
Information war also includes omitting information or blocking it. Its the regulation of information therefore its manipulation not just creating false narratives for consumption.
Nashville is a center for entertainment especially downtown. It also has alot of corporation buildings that are international such as ATT. Travelers often make fun of this building becuz of its sinister appearance dubbing it Lex Luther's tower or Temple of Doom etc. Theres also a major train route that goes through the area. When you talk about the music business you are also talking about any unsavory vice you can think of and that is something to consider as a possible link to security as well.
How can in this day and age a city like Nashville not know if someone is dangerous, has to be watched becuz they are becoming a serious threat or prevent an act of terrorism? Its unthinkable.
A city like Las Vegas? A major long time hotel chain that is a venue for big name entertainers? Vegas knows when math geniuses are cheating at card tables with home made counting devices hidden in their damn shoes. They didnt find the loads of bags the shooter brought in unusual? Why might that have been? Probably becuz gun runners will bring in that kind of luggage regularly and if Vegas knows who the guy is and hes doing 'business' but not causing any trouble-what goes on in Vegas stays in Vegas. Especially if hes selling to anyone involved with their people etc.
What we have to ask about most of these stories is why are people who have been known somewhere for years doing the same things they have done for those years the same way- why are these people suddenly becoming radicalized as the official narrative claims? The radicalization process for most of the people supposedly responsible for lone shootings or bombings is around one to two years. Why? Theres either a very fast and strange radicalization or personality change in these people or as I've linked prior the authorities are warned but they take no action which in itself is suspect and way to convenient.
Other factors are not presented to the public in any sort of report such as things that have become common denominators like a fatherless household or taking psychiatric medications.
When presented with the presence of psychiatric medications as part of any lone shooters recent history one must introduce the very controversial but still valid possibility that a sinister plot may have been at work to reshape the individual into a violent person by means of possibly altering the contents of the medications. These are also claims made from theorists decades ago-that a person can be victimized by way of poisoning food or their environment. If one thinks about such a prospect in every day life it would seem paranoid or far fetched however, poisons are a classic part of spy craft back to earliest history. So is brainwashing and the creation of assassins or persons brainwashed to commit violence against thier own Will, usually using mind control methods and that usually includes chemical means such as drugging.
It seems that part of getting society to stop truth seeking or searching for alternatives through theorizing is to also get them to forget about the very factual history of mind control, unethical human experimentation, spy craft throughout history, military atrocities, intrigue and that anything covert actually exists.
It helps considerably to have an army of brainwashed recruited youngsters believing that everything that is bad and wrong with the world exists right in plain sight and can be fixed with enough protesting, rioting, looting, whining, judging, censoring, cancel culture, silencing and re arranging societal demographics to achieve 'equality' when in fact the human animal is incapable of such a thing to begin with.
Kids today seem to believe that everything covert went out with the Cold War. As if such things are not part of our very human nature and in actuality, pretty much is the way the world is actually run compared to what we are shown as part of our reality.
To not believe or understand that something hidden exists beyond what you can see or perceive is very unwise.
That is expected from young people- its the adult population that shocks me. However another part of this problem is that your average person who until recently had no access to any information about what was going on in the world at large is now exposed to a fraction of that information and that even seems to be too much. I think people didnt know what went in the world and now they see it they simply cannot handle it. A sort of bubble is formed for protection, to replace the natural filters we had before thus we live in not an enlightened society but one just as ignorant as pre internet or even more myopic.
What is happening in society now is a perfect example of why mobs arent supposed to rule and we have law and order. The blame lays on our society making people give up their faith in our system working as its supposed to and the corportacracy filling thier heads with fantasies of a perfect consumer world thus tempting them with irresponsibility instead of genuine civic mindedness which would lead to real change. We are now drowned in a population of new money known to olde money as 'the socially irresponsible rich' and with good reason. This global new wealth is a contributing factor in the degeneration of the quality of life for everyone else.
An example of how damaging information war and media content has become is a family member I have that is a mid age Baby Boomer. If you are a Gen Xer you know there are degrees of Boomers. This person came of age a bit after the huge revolution years but close enough to be a typical young person during the early 70s. So they know enough about the revolution days but they werent quite involved like thier older siblings. This may account for a more selfish outlook (ME generation) as opposed to a more politically enlightened one as I have gotten from Boomers born early as to come of age in the mid 60s.
This person has seen enough life to know the way things work and also has at least a two year college education. However during Trump like other loyal hardcore Democrats from traditional blue states, this person seemed to lose all sensibility. Towards Trumps last year in office this person was convinced of every story from CNN and any other news blip off of social media and basically came to perceive Trump was some sort of king who one must fear as he could do whatever he wanted. They also were misinformed that "Trumps white supremacist armies" were responsible for all of the Antifa/BLM rioting and looting this past summer. They also believed every other propaganda you could imagine pushed by the Left's media machine thats been created over these years where news outlets have lost any journalistic qualities are serve as mouthpieces for skewed, biased stories that serve an agenda.
Part of the problem is also that this new loaded language from the progressive left PC culture (always a necessity in a cult) has become definitive of this new society thats been formed and many uneducated and older people cannot keep up. Its not fair and its manipulative and it adds to isolation and exclusion from the very system that claims to seek the opposite.
I tried to remind this person about their education, that they must have learned about checks and balances in government. They actually claimed that the right and GOP didn't respect the US Constitution in our country. At election time they were totally unaware of Biden's progressive agenda and still believed every piece of disinformation about Trump. I had to do research and calm thier fears to show them that Trump was not planning to nor was he able to legally take away our social security system in this country-becuz the leftist news outlets had scared them with biased news stories. I told them that Trump can introduce any idea or bill he wants-such a bill would be doa in congress or senate. I found information from fact checking sites and more balanced news outlets explaining the issues more factually. I reminded them about our system of checks and balances. Each time they seemed to blame Trump for everything or have irrational fears of his actions they would become temporarily calmed but would consume more bad info on news channels and remain with the same mindset. This person actually said that FOX News was "fake news". I had to explain to them what 'fake news' actually means-a website created by someone claiming to be a legit news outlet with actual real journalists with degrees.
I also told them that our system is still in place even with media for checks and balances and that a major national news network channel would not be allowed to be a fake station. They begrudgingly changed their statement to saying they "disliked" FOX News which is alot saner and more reasonable.
If anyone should be monitored for misinformation its some of the major news networks that exist today that are toxic to people and only serve to instill fear, perpetuate ignorance and cause divisions in society not censoring conspiracy theorists.
Understanding how stressful the overload of conflicting often toxic info can be on your average sensible citizen imagine what our modern day overload can do to a person who is struggling with mental health issues or even trauma.
With so much social engineering going on and far too quickly some people who are already isolated could be effected adversely by the way the world is changing. It seems that even though people think they are more connected and involved than ever people can be more isolated than before the internet reality took over. This may be a factor in what motivates people who become shooters or blow something up. It's not their mental illness nor conspiracy theories. If it's not a set up with a patsy then the person responsible may have snapped due to personal reasons along with not being able to deal with a society that's left them behind or has become hostile towards them (due to social engineering making it weaponized against their demographic).
Its a major mistake to allow the reality created by using the internet to become a replacement for the reality humans have known and understood before. If society loses it's humanity how can we not understand that individuals in such a society may do so to an extreme. Let's face it. The major bonding we all share nowadays is by being part of the corporate consumer culture and the world of the internet.
Another factor is that as I mentioned people get more information than they did before. We really dont know what comparative numbers of lone shootings or lone actor violent actions went on before the internet was around the deliver that information. Nor do are we fully aware of the extent of other human crimes like serial killers, murders, rapes etc.
Humans are violent and just becuz an angry mob perpetrates violence in the name of a supposed good or moral cause does not change the fact its violent.
Look at the situation we are dealing with in the past month: turn on each other and burn and loot and harass and destroy other citizens property, safety and peace of mind=GOOD. Turn on government employees and destroy government property, safety and thier peace of mind=BAD.
The lesson of the outrageous actions in our nations Capitol recently should have been that if you allow lawlessness when you are in charge of enforcing it, it may turn on you where you think you are not effected becuz you think you are exempt. If the lawmakers had enforced peaceful protest laws and if our society was still sane and sensible enough to understand that changing the laws should come first by protesting THEN riot and loot and burn if that is not done then this never would have occurred.
The entire year's violence seems manufactured somehow to many people it certainly seems by design and the timing is far too convenient.
Every case of a violent act by someone who is isolated, mentally ill or suspiciously now dead and cant speak for themselves should require the kind of investigation that any other crime warrants and there should be a law that all information about the case and its findings be released to the public. Every single perpetrator of such violence should be psychologically evaluated on video and that should also be released to the public as well as an interview within custody right after being captured by authorities. There should be strict laws on drugging the suspect. Many people noticed how doped up the Colorado shooter was looking uncharacteristically deranged with wild orange hair. Again, looking and acting very differently than just a year or two prior.
The bottom line that anyone has to understand to keep our society free from those that will manipulate vulnerable people and unfortunate situations like these for their own agendas especially over the next four years is that IF SOMEONE IS GOING TO COMMIT VIOLENCE FOR ANY REASON THEY ARE GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY.
If not then there needs to be a thorough investigation as to what made the person become so distraught and so far gone from their own humanity that they would commit such an act on others and themselves.
The TRUE answer is that INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNET is only a part of this equation. There has to be an admission that our society is becoming so violent, so biased, tribalist, exclusionary (while pushing Inclusion), so corrupt and full of falsehoods and lacking in hope and so much disconnection while always being connected via cold, mindless technology that some people will react badly. Its been proven that PC culture, internet activism and globalism generally with thier concept of 'Community' actually causes people to be less civic minded generally.
All that time and energy looting, rioting, tweeting etc etc for a biased, subjective agenda of special interests probably perpetrated and guided by corporate interest at its core hasnt fixed the real black lives that matter who are in Detroit being left behind by gentrification from globalism nor has it changed the lives of the elderly, the blind, the homeless, the disabled or the true inequality that exists between the western world and the rest of the world.
EIther these lone actors are being manufactured through manipulation somehow and used as patsies or the world has become so inhumane that people are acting out in ways that may be totally normal given the circumstances-but then as I mentioned one must consider that this WOULD BE NORMAL behavior under such circumstances but we DONT HAVE ANY RECORDS OF IT prior to the i internet age as we do today. Perhaps a very learned history professor of a similar era (minus the internet factor of course) could tell us that this is what humans do under these conditions. But we arent asking those questions.
Thats the main problem with any suspected false flags or whatever you want to call them. The most productive line of questioning is avoided if any is allowed at all.
As I was writing this I saw on TV that another shooting took place, one in Atlanta GA, a young white male shot up some message parlors. Immediately, a light skinned African American male who was a retired official from Pennsylvania claimed that he believes that it will turn out the motive for the shootings was "Asian hate". That is a hell of a statement to make in a society where the kid is supposed to get a trial to determine his guilt and an investigation is supposed to be done to determine motive, method, opportunity etc. So this man is judge and jury and detective.
We have to stop and think-do not accept hearsay or mob rules. Who exactly is the man giving his 'expert' opinion? Are we going to do research on him and learn he has a past of corruption or it will surface in the future? Most people at this point like my relatives are so beaten down with the worst case of Stockholm Syndrome Ive ever seen a nation suffer from-that they wont even think critically or do research. They will choose thier side politically and believe what they are told immediately from that camp. Not much of a democracy and not much of a quality of life. Especially for the patsy, the victims and every person who is going ot suffer being censored or judged or vilified by such methods.
What exactly does "hate" entail? What scenarios apply? Does the shooter "hate" the Asian women working at the message parlors becuz they are Chinese or some 'China Virus' type conspiracy theory of motive or does he hate them becuz hes angry with women or he got ripped off at a parlor or resents the kind of women who provide 'happy endings?' (Update: without a trial or even any evidence form interviewing the accused shooter, the Lefts experts, mouth pieces and propaganda machine are turning out opinions and ideology as fact. They are claiming "classism and racism and gender" issues is what caused the shooting. It's gotten so bad with mob rules.)
The ending is probably already written and we can assume that not just by the way these things usually play out in the media but by the 'expert' opinion from some retired agenda asshole who isnt even near that region or ever had any jurisdiction there. Sounds like hes a pissed off northerner who 'hates' southern whites. How do we know?
Being able to produce theories that may help people understand a confusing, turbulent world better is a damn public service at this point. The only thing causing violence is the very same conditions that cause activists to have to form alternative theories to raise awareness against those conditions.
We must keep making people think and keep them thinking.
(UPDATE: the hate content on the Altanta shooters Facebook has been deemed fake and has been taken down by FB.
However the damage is done. The public will only remember the propaganda they wont recieve enough blast on the fact the content was fake to frame the shooter for his motive.
What we now should be asking is who produced and posted that Asian hate content to begin with? That is the crime that must be investigated. So now its that easy. A simple frame up and an agenda has its numbers of believers and supporters swell. This is the danger we must face. )
