http://www.it-online.co.za/content/view/616970/ Not so much the content in detail fo the article itself, but the attitude is echoed throughout our public spaces now. Even privately..this approach is prevelant throughout our society.
And there is a purposeful naivete..not mention at ALL about how any of this can be abused for victimization or corruption.
THE HUMAN ERROR IT SEEMS IS IN THE PEOPLE THAT WILL USE IT FOR CRIMINAL OR UNETHICAL ENDS. ALSO, I FIND IT IRONIC THAT "HUMAN ERROR" AND "MALICIOUS ATTACKS" ARE TWO PHRASES USED SO CLOSE TOGETHER. AS A WRITER I CAN SEE THE FOLLY IN THIS AND THIS IS WHY SOCIETY NEEDS ARTISTS AND PHILOSOPHERS AND ANTHROPOLOGISTS.
YOU ARE NOT REALIZING THAT THESE PHRASES HAVE OTHER MEANINGS... TECH CAN BE USED FOR MALICOUS ATTACKS ON INNOCENTS OR MISUSED...AND DUE TO THE 'HUMAN ERROR' OF NOT FOCUSING ON THAT YOU CREATE MORE ERROR AND MISINTERPRETATION OF THE TECHNOLOGY ITSELF.
Unless of course I am the one being naive....and that is the exact purpose of your actions.