TRANSLATOR

Indigo Awareness Ribbon

Indigo Awareness Ribbon

Blog DISCLAIMERS

Please be advised that this written work is theory. It's theorizing, pondering and amateur research. For legal reasons I state that I have no actual belief in these theories as fact, if I did I would have sought legal recourse. Until that occurs this blog can only be considered theory. If it does then any and all actions PAST AND FUTURE that have been taken against me during the years producing this work will be labeled war crimes under international law and any other legal protections that apply.
I am a writer, an activist and artist. I claim my RIGHT TO EXIST legally under US Constitution and international law.

This is an educational blog for awareness as well as sometimes a telling of candid personal experiences to demonstrate theories as they might be experienced by a person who theoretically is existing under such conditions. Thus the 'candid' expression, poetic license and marketing myself as product or character. This is NOT a journal or diary.
Being a reasonable person of sound mind if I had concerns for my safety or others I would take responsible action for self care as my established medical history can demonstrate.
Any actions taken against me by others questioning my sanity or competence based on my produced work will be construed as activist/dissident intimidation and whistle blower retaliation and proper legal action will be taken against you by my family and support system.

Be warned that no further interference with my production of meaningful work as an artist and activist will be tolerated.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

NY Post Article 'Myth Of The Lone Wolf Shooter' Tries To Reason With Whatever Reasonable People Are Left In USA

http://nypost.com/2016/06/18/why-the-lone-wolf-terrorist-is-a-myth/

What this article is trying to show smart, thinking people is that lone shooters don't exist-in any circumstances. No one sits around by themselves and slowly seethes with so much hatred that they decide to go out and kill people. There has to be a reason.

The point the article is making is that there has to be something to react against-a motivator or something that has made the person desperate.
Terrorism is reactionary. I've posted this before. People who indulge in any kind of act of terrorism are desperate, suicidal, homicidal and feel as if there is no other option.
Either that or as in much foriegn terrorism theres cult type influence involved and very deep brainwashing or thought control.

Why would someone who's supposedly a loner have anything against a large group of strangers? It doesn't even make any sense. Hell, even paranoids have standards. This is just a modern tactic to scare the public into vilifying anything that isn't herd mentality.

There would have to have been people who hurt them, tortured them, made them angry, made them feel desperate enough to actually kill. No amount of 'mental illness' on its own would drive someone to those lengths-the mental illness would have to be so severe that people would notice there was something wrong with the person to begin with before it got to that point.

Acting weird or oddly isn't enough.
Like in my situation-becoming completely freaked out by your home or nest being destroyed where you were supported, tolerated and accepted for years as well as suffering ill health. Then fleeing out of fear and confusion and you become sleep deprived. Those behaviors along with being a smart mouth sometimes angry person on a public blog does not make a case for dangerousness.
JUST BECUZ SOMEONE PUTS YOUR NAME ON A FAX THEY WROTE or if they bare false witness against you-specifically if you have no violent history or any weapons charges, ownership or knowledge of firearms-doesn't make any sensible case for lone shooter potential.
Just becuz you dont like what someone writes doesn't mean you have the right to just attach their name to threatening emails.
Alas in a democracy, how else can you stop freedom of speech...or the right to bare arms?

The people perpetrating my frame up should become fiction writers. Their plots suck and are weak though. It's not unusual however in this world if people have enough money and connections, they are rewarded even though they are untalented and whatever they create or contrive no matter how ill crafted, unbelievable or piss poor in quality is forced down the gullet of the public to be accepted as a worthy creation. Perhaps they should write shitty action novels...or canned humour, predictable situational comedies for TV.

What's going on now it's unbelievable, it's really really bad. It's like Nazi Germany, East Germany or the USSR or some other historical nightmare where they can just come and grab you at any time under false pretenses and put you away that is exactly what happened to me twice. Not once-twice. And they're using punitive psychiatry the way they have in Russia historically.

For some reason in the last year or two it's degenerated to the point where they can just do whatever they want because the lone shootings are so prevalent during Obama's administration and towards the end of his presidency people are scared..or can hide behind that in the community...like during the Salem witch trials in New England.

It's so crazy right now if you are an activist or someone else who is inconvenient or you're on somebody powerful's s*** list you can be framed up and dragged away for something you did not do and put away as if you lived in some other nation not the United States and you have no rights at all. That's how bad it is out there right now. And it's a coward's power trip: 'oh boy look at us we don't have to respect laws or due process (either the public or those in the judicial system). We can do whatever we want.' Essentially the people involved are flaunting being above the law, while hiding behind it.

And literally all the police, the hospitals and the medical staff have to do is outright lie even the jail they put you in can be abusive and they don't fear any sort of consequences.

Believe it or not a lot of journalists know what's going on and they want to help but they can't come out and say stuff about the situation because they don't want to get blacklisted or fired or whatever.

Their biggest advantage is if you do not have legal representation beforehand and if you don't have a support system or your support system is easily broken down.

Of course only during Obama could people be this asleep in dreamland and unrealistic. I mean look at the way Hillary and him talk to the American public. They talk to people like they're little children, its like our culture's been regressed.
'We're going to take things away from you for the common good!' If you want to have an adult conversation about taxes thats fine but what the hell is that?

it's much easier now because the public have been degenerated morally over the years from this ongoing constant war overseas and constantly dealing with threats of terrorism.

This country wants to b**** and moan and protest about the actions of policemen or against policeman but you are the ones that militarized your police force for foreign terrorism during Bush and that's turned ugly because without realizing it you never took into consideration that the police department perhaps hasn't changed the way that they operate.
There's always going to be corruption. You're militarizing those people too.

It became glaringly obvious to me it was never more obvious than it was when I was in that jail in New Hampshire that I don't belong in that world I don't think like these people I never have. The cops and the criminals, the COs and the inmates all resemble each other.

What shocks me is at least before they had to have some kind of premise it was real to make you look as if you had to be watched or there was an investigation.

I have to walk around at this point wondering when the next cop cars are going to come after me in the street at any time to take me to jail for something once again I didn't do that's how bad it is out there right now.

2 comments:

  1. Yeah, it's so easy for certain key players in this thing to simply make up a lie, and they can have you sent away. They could do this during Bush. During Bush, it seemed they used a lot of electronic torture, and I assume it's because they didn't have the tight grip on the masses that they have now. So they had to compensate by punishing you harder.

    I've had people tell me that "had to do it". However, the people that "had" to do it were lazy pampered types that couldn't get ahead any other way. And I wonder about that, if they were really afraid of getting targeted, or if their laziness and pampered-ness mixed in with a little hatred and envy didn't have more to do with it. Some of these people that "had to do it" really don't work very hard for anything, and it seems to me that taking the easy way out was the prime motivating factor. Plus, the opportunity was right there under their noses, and this was the perfect chance. They "had to do it"? Right. Who was putting a gun to their heads?

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1392&context=facpubs
    In CIA v. Sims,2 the United States Supreme Court held that the CIA
    could withhold information about controversial government-sponsored
    psychological experiments in response to Freedom of Information Act
    (FOIA) requests.3

    Found this and thought you would be interested! Im praying for you and Im being targeted too!

    ReplyDelete