(I use Wikipedia here as reference. It's good enough for this subjectmatter. If you do actual credible research I'm sure higher standard references are available and can be referenced.)
I've noticed many articles produced over the past 5 years or so that claim 'gang stalking' is a totally implausible, delusional 'belief' with claims forums and groups dealing with the issue are dangerous, its ruining lives and harming people-all the bullshit you'd expect after Bradley/Chelsea Manning, WIKILEAKS and Snowden as well as 9-11 Truth or even EARTH FIRST! and similar groups that actually want real change and have a legit laundry list and mission.
Whats surprising is the sources for these articles, some are actual peer reviewed papers put out by .gov sources or universities. Years ago, respectable sources like this wouldnt lower themselves to partaking in such propaganda pandering nor would they be caught up in producing works that are obviously going to crumble under investigation or when put through the rigors of what they claim are the standards for producing such works.
One can definitively smell desperation in every one of these articles. After WIKILEAKS its not surprising and MIT getting into the act after being caught for the Jeffrey Epstein scandal as well as taking part in framing activists who go against the Complex (or anyone who has dirt on them related to sex crimes such as Epstien was involved in)-well they've got to pay the rent on that of course. This is the college that actually wasted their time producing a paper attempting to debunk the 'tin foil hat' theory when all it takes to demonstrate that it would theoretically work if the same methods were applied in making a simple RFID chip blocker such as the sleeves we buy to put IDs and credit cards in to stop identity theft. The theory should be that if people possibly arent simply paranoids or delusional then they are at worst uneducated about science and really bad at engineering lol.
The tone of all these articles is very know-it-all, very condescending and aligned with our Trump era obsession with 'fake news' term being misused to describing any opinion we dont agree with and a very strong campaign to destroy conspiracy theory culture. This works especially well in the environment now of not being allowed to question or disagree with what is put forth as moral, right, just or 'progressive'. The very academic institutions that produced these bogus articles are the same who have replaced education with indoctrination and disinformation. Thus it makes sense they would be in the business of disinformation nowadays. They've lost respectability and credibility so there are no longer standards to adhere to.
This comes along at a time when many activists and dissident voices have been silenced and much of the conspiracy theory culture has been systematically dismantled through propaganda, frame ups and other classic COINTELPRO methods as well as alot of diversion.
So just a reminder that anyone can make claims all about conspiracy theory or even theorizing about being targeted or even believing it; the danger is when conspiracy theory is accepted without research and without it remaining a theory. It's okay to believe conspiracy theories, it's not ok completely to believe conspiracies as fact- unless you have solid proof or are experiencing it first hand as a victim/witness or witness. Q-Anon is an example of this and it's probable that entire movement was created by the system to sew chaos and discredit other conspiracy theories or alternative history/facts.
It seems that there is now total disregard for knowledge of history and other documented realities concerning human societies, human behavior, oppressive systems of governing or power structure. This is the real institutional oppression.
"The Stasi would often identify refusal to collaborate, using another jargon term, as "enemy-negative conduct" ("feindlich-negativen Haltung"), which frequently resulted in what they termed "Zersetzungsmaßnahmen", a term for which no very direct English translation is available, but for one form of which a definition has been provided that begins:
"a systematic degradation of reputation, image, and prestige in a database on one part true, verifiable and degrading, and on the other part false, plausible, irrefutable, and always degrading; a systematic organization of social and professional failures for demolishing the self-confidence of the individual..."."
"Zersetzung (pronounced [t͡sɛɐ̯ˈzɛt͡sʊŋ], German for "decomposition") is a psychological warfare technique used by the Ministry for State Security (Stasi) to repress political opponents in East Germany during the 1970s and 1980s. Zersetzung served to combat alleged and actual dissidents through covert means, using secret methods of abusive control and psychological manipulation to prevent anti-government activities."
Theoretically this system could be used by the private sector if resources were available.
"The Stasi used operational psychology and its extensive network of......informal collaborators.....to launch personalized psychological attacks against targets to damage their mental health and lower chances of a "hostile action" against the state."
"Operations were designed to intimidate and destabilise them by subjecting them to repeated disappointment, and to socially alienate them by interfering with and disrupting their relationships with others as in social undermining. The aim was to induce personal crises in victims, leaving them too unnerved and psychologically distressed to have the time and energy for anti-government activism."
"Once aware of his own status as a target....Wolfgang Templin tried, with some success, to bring details of the Stasi's Zersetzung activities to the attention of western journalists. In 1977 Der Spiegel published a five-part article series, "Du sollst zerbrechen!" ("You're going to crack!"), by the exiled Jürgen Fuchs, in which he describes the Stasi's "operational psychology". The Stasi tried to discredit Fuchs and the contents of similar articles, publishing in turn claims that he had a paranoid view of its function,and intending that Der Spiegel and other media would assume he was suffering from a persecution complex."
That last line should tell you why the latest pile of junk science articles are being produced over the past five years.
Dont get bullshitted by diversion, intimidation or disinformation. This actually happened and can happen again. This is a norm for human societies not an exception. Our Constitutional government is the exception.
Remember the Stasi system was called 'secret' for a reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment